Skip to main content

Posts

Featured

Posh law - Procedure as the Handmaiden of Justice": Overcoming Technical Loopholes in POSH Enforcement.

A recurring vulnerability in employment law is the weaponization of hyper-technical procedural rules to shield severe workplace misconduct. In high-stakes disciplinary actions, respondents frequently scour dense, legacy civil service rules or ancient standing orders to find minor administrative omissions, using them to stall, invalidate, or completely quash severe penalties. In Arun A. Iyer v. IIT Bombay, the Bombay High Court forcefully addressed this issue, reminding corporate and institutional employers that "procedure is the handmaiden of justice," designed to facilitate equity rather than act as a technical loophole for evasion. The Court observed that a highly formalistic, myopic approach cannot be adopted when interpreting enforcement mechanisms under specialized, welfare-driven legislations like the POSH Act . When an autonomous institution or a corporate entity possesses a robust internal framework that explicitly outlines how sexual harassment complaints are investi...

Latest posts

POSH Law: No Double Jeopardy in POSH Inquiries: The Myth of the "Second Departmental Trial.

Posh law - From Compliance to Culture.

Leadership Responsibility in Preventing Workplace Harassment

Posh Act - Confidentiality vs Transparency

Posh Law - Digital Workplace Harassment & Social Media Misconduct

Legal Architecture of the POSH Act, 2013: Rights, Duties & Liabilities

Posh Law - Submitting the POSH Report with Accountability

How POSH Inquiries Conclude with Fair Findings.

POSH Law - Interim Reliefs in POSH Cases

Posh Law - The Role of Conciliation in POSH Investigations